“AI is neither good nor synthetic,” says Nicolelis.

Neuroscientist Miguel Nicolelis mentioned, in an interview with Folha de S. Paulo, this Saturday (08), that “synthetic intelligence” is “neither clever nor synthetic”. The researcher additionally criticized the Israeli author Yuval Harari, writer of “Sapiens” and the ChatGPT device.

“From a scientific perspective, I’ve been saying this for years, and now Noam Chomsky makes use of the identical phrase, AI is neither clever nor synthetic. It isn’t synthetic as a result of it’s of our making, it’s pure. And it isn’t clever as a result of intelligence is an emergent property of organisms interacting with the setting.” And with different organisms. It’s a product of Darwin’s strategy of pure choice. An algorithm can stroll and do issues, but it surely’s not clever by definition,” Nicolelis explains.

The scientist has been working with neural networks for 30 years, and they’re the mechanism behind present machine studying algorithms. As an authority on brain-machine interfaces, he has labored on creating neural prostheses able to reproducing physique actions. On the opening of the 2014 World Cup, in Rio de Janeiro, a wheelchair consumer kicked the ball into the purpose with the assistance of kit he developed.

In accordance with Nicolelis, it’s “ridiculous” to say that language paradigms like ChatGPT are 10 instances smarter than people. “In a approach, ChatGPT is a superb impersonator, as a result of it takes materials that has been made by a gaggle of individuals, mixes it up and creates one thing that it calls a brand new product, however is definitely very a lot influenced by the mental product of 1000’s upon 1000’s of human beings. For the trendy capitalist system, AI is the nice advertising and marketing device , As a result of it generates full inequality within the relationship with the workforce. A supervisor can say: I’ve a synthetic intelligence utility, if a employee doesn’t settle for the wage that I wish to pay him, which is 10% of what he earns right this moment, I hearth him and use the applying. There’s a entire ideology, says the researcher To switch human labor, which can’t be accomplished 100%, there isn’t a approach.

About Yoval Harari’s “Sapiens” work, Nicolelis says the Israeli author “mixes issues from different areas with out deep information.” “At Sapiens, the reviewer mixes up and interprets our ends in a approach that has completely nothing to do with what we did. It’s a job that I’ve spent 30 years of my life doing. When he says that sooner or later we’re going to place this factor known as a brain-brain interface, which was an experimental factor I did with mice, I’ve accomplished it with monkeys and we’ve accomplished it with people for rehab. But it surely’s not that I’m going to alternate my emotions with different folks. It’s an alternate of engine instructions, correct issues to scale back digital logic. He interpreted it as if I used to be studying somebody’s thoughts, which might by no means occur. He says:” We’ll stay to be 200 years previous”, “we’ll put an finish to previous age”. It’s all fiction, ”explains Nicolelis.

Be a part of our WhatsApp group, Click on on this hyperlink

Be a part of our Telegram channel, Click on on this hyperlink